top of page
Search

Embracing Difference: How to Build a Culture that Thrives on Variety

  • Writer: Or Bar Cohen
    Or Bar Cohen
  • Sep 15
  • 4 min read

Organizations often celebrate unity, shared values, common goals, and a unified approach. While alignment can strengthen collaboration, it also risks sliding into uniformity. And uniformity can be dangerous. When people are forced to think, act, or deliver in the same way, the organization loses out on the richness of difference.


It’s a bit like that viral video of farm animals attempting Olympic dives. Each animal tries the same jump—but what works for one looks awkward for another. In organizations, we see the same mismatch when employees are pushed into molds that don’t fit. The challenge is not only to accept differences but to build a culture that benefits from them actively.


Research shows that teams that embrace diverse perspectives are more innovative, adaptable, and engaged (Edmondson, 1999; Ely & Thomas, 2001). Here are seven strategies for leaders who want to design cultures that truly allow difference.


ree

1. Redefine Success Beyond a Single Standard

Organizations often reward one type of employee—the extroverted leader, the fast decision-maker, the person who speaks up first. But success has many shapes. A thoughtful analyst who refines a process can be just as valuable as a persuasive salesperson. Narrow performance standards limit innovation and distort value (DeNisi & Murphy, 2017).


Practical step: Update performance reviews to recognize multiple forms of contribution, from collaborative problem-solving to independent innovation


2. Foster Psychological Safety

Difference is meaningless if people don’t feel safe to express it. Employees will stay silent if they fear criticism, which prevents organizations from learning.


Practical step: Psychological safety is strongly linked to learning and innovation in teams (Edmondson, 1999). Train leaders to ask open questions, admit mistakes, and reward constructive dissent. Teams should see disagreement as a resource, not a threat.


3. Empower Strength-Based Roles

When employees are placed in roles that ignore their strengths, their motivation and performance decline. People flourish when their natural talents are recognized and used. Strength-based approaches increase engagement and performance (Clifton & Harter, 2003).


Practical step: Use structured feedback and assessments to identify strengths and assign projects accordingly. Matching employees to tasks is not indulgence - it’s strategic.


4. Encourage Adaptive Leadership

No single leadership style works for every context. Leaders who cling to one approach often alienate people who need something different. Adaptive leadership allows diversity to thrive. Adaptive leadership supports organizational survival in complex environments (Heifetz & Linsky, 2002).


Practical step: Train managers to flex between coaching, delegating, and directing depending on the task and the person. Reflection after projects helps leaders improve their adaptability.


5. Create Spaces for Cross-Functional Collaboration

True innovation often happens at the intersections of disciplines. Different backgrounds bring unique perspectives that, when combined, generate stronger solutions.


Practical step: Cross-disciplinary collaboration enhances creativity and group performance (Van Knippenberg, De Dreu, & Homan, 2004). Establish cross-functional projects and workshops where employees from varied fields collaborate on shared challenges. Formalize these opportunities so they don’t remain accidental


6. Reframe Mistakes as Learning Opportunities

Cultures that punish mistakes discourage risk-taking. But when mistakes are seen as valuable data, organizations encourage experimentation and innovation. Organizations that treat mistakes as learning opportunities are more resilient and innovative (Cannon & Edmondson, 2005).


Practical step: Hold retrospectives after projects where the focus is on lessons learned, not blame. Share insights across teams to normalize learning from failure.


7. Celebrate Diversity in Communication Styles

Some employees excel in presentations, while others shine in written reports or informal discussions. Limiting communication to a single style means missing out on valuable contributions.


Practical step: Valuing diverse communication styles fosters inclusion and belonging (Ely & Thomas, 2001). Provide multiple channels for sharing ideas - verbal, written, and visual - and rotate formats to give each style legitimacy.


Closing Thoughts

Cultures that allow difference are not chaotic—they are powerful. They create space for people to work from their strengths, for teams to innovate, and for organizations to adapt in uncertain times. Expecting everyone to “dive” in the same way is both unrealistic and wasteful.


Leaders who design systems that celebrate variety will find that difference is not a problem to solve but the very foundation of long-term success.


References

  • Cannon, M. D., & Edmondson, A. C. (2005). Failing to learn and learning to fail (intelligently): How great organizations put failure to work to innovate and improve. Long Range Planning, 38(3), 299–319.

  • Clifton, D. O., & Harter, J. K. (2003). Investing in strengths. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 111–121). Berrett-Koehler.

  • DeNisi, A. S., & Murphy, K. R. (2017). Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress? Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 421–433.

  • Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.

  • Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 229–273.

  • Heifetz, R. A., & Linsky, M. (2002). Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers of leading. Harvard Business Press.

  • Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page