In leadership studies, metaphors often illuminate truths that formal models sometimes overlook. A recent viral video showed a woman practicing yoga as a goat quietly watched her—and then imitated her pose. While lighthearted, this moment encapsulates a profound lesson: leadership is less about what we say and more about what we model.

Research in organizational behavior consistently emphasizes that followers are strongly influenced by observable behavior, authenticity, and consistent signals from leaders (Bandura, 1977; Brown & Treviño, 2006).

The goat didn’t respond to words; it responded to presence, curiosity, and example. Let’s explore six essential lessons this video illustrates, with practical implications for leaders.

1. Lead by Example, Not Instruction

Social learning theory argues that individuals are more likely to adopt behaviors they see modeled effectively (Bandura, 1977). In the workplace, this means employees mirror the standards they see in their leaders. The goat copied the yoga pose not because it was told, but because it witnessed a behavior worth imitating.

Practical takeaway: Rather than emphasizing policies, leaders should consciously demonstrate the values they want their teams to embody, such as integrity, resilience, or collaboration. This may mean showing up prepared for meetings, handling conflict constructively, or being the first to take accountability when things go wrong.

2. Consistency Builds Trust

Trust in leadership emerges not from one decision, but from a series of consistent actions over time. Research shows that behavioral consistency is a critical predictor of leader credibility (Simons, 2002). Just as one yoga pose does not make a practice, one good decision does not make a leader.

Practical takeaway: Leaders should aim for coherence between words and actions. If a leader emphasizes work-life balance but consistently sends late-night emails, employees learn that the spoken value is hollow. Establishing routines, clear communication, and predictable fairness can help sustain organizational trust.

3. Curiosity Sparks Engagement

The goat’s initial behavior was curiosity, a trait that mirrors how employees respond to novel or inspiring leadership. Curiosity in leaders fosters innovation, exploration, and a sense of psychological safety (Edmondson, 1999). A curious leader invites others to step beyond the obvious and experiment.

Practical takeaway: Leaders can spark curiosity by asking open-ended questions, encouraging

brainstorming without judgment, and rewarding experimentation even when outcomes fall short. This shifts organizational culture from risk-aversion to adaptive learning.

4. Presence Matters More Than Words

Non-verbal behavior and authentic presence are often more influential than verbal communication. Studies in leadership presence suggest that being accessible, attentive, and engaged has more potent effects on motivation than formal speeches or slogans (Goleman, Boyatzis, & McKee, 2013). In the video, the woman did not instruct the goat; her quiet presence was enough to influence.

Practical takeaway: Leaders should prioritize being present with their teams. This may involve walking the floor, joining informal team discussions, or dedicating time for one-on-one check-ins where active listening takes precedence over talking.

5. Small Actions Create Big Ripples

Seemingly minor actions by leaders can have disproportionate effects on organizational culture. Research highlights the “butterfly effect” in leadership, where small gestures like recognition or acknowledgment can create long-term loyalty and engagement (Cameron, 2012). The goat’s imitation reminds us that even one small act can shape broader behavior.

Practical takeaway: Leaders should not underestimate the power of micro-actions - thanking a team member publicly, recognizing effort during complex projects, or maintaining eye contact when someone shares an idea. These gestures accumulate into cultural norms.

6. Authenticity Is Contagious

Authentic leadership theory emphasizes self-awareness, relational transparency, and internalized moral perspective (Avolio & Gardner, 2005). People are more likely to follow leaders they perceive as genuine rather than those performing a role. The goat imitated not because the pose was perfect, but because it was real.

Practical takeaway: Leaders should embrace their authentic selves, acknowledging limitations and modeling vulnerability when appropriate. Sharing personal challenges or admitting mistakes can encourage a culture where others feel safe to bring their whole selves to work.

Conclusion

The video of a goat copying a yoga pose may seem whimsical, but it reveals profound truths about leadership. People follow presence more than words, authenticity more than perfection, and consistency more than charisma.

For leaders, the challenge is not to instruct constantly but to embody the values they want their teams to live by. In organizations, just as on a yoga mat, leadership is less about directing and more about modeling.

Find this helpful, yet have more questions? Check out my services here and drop me a line or@everythinghr-or.com

References

• Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338.

• Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

• Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616.

• Cameron, K. S. (2012). Positive leadership: Strategies for extraordinary performance. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

• Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.

• Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2013). Primal leadership: Unleashing the power of emotional intelligence. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.

• Simons, T. (2002). Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers' words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13(1), 18–35.